Bill to replace Saskatchewan. The legislature is ready to pass security Pi News

News Details

The Saskatchewan government will soon pass Bill 70, which will change the security of the Assembly building and its surroundings.

The current security system appointed by the Speaker and oversees the security of the Responsible Sergeant has been in place for over 30 years.

The Opposition proposed an amendment to the Bill, with the Speaker appointing the Chief of Defense Staff and informing the Speaker of that person.

It has raised concerns that the new Security Council could be “discriminatory.”

“We want the security of this building. The people of Saskatchewan want the security of this building to last more than 30 years.

Amendments Minister of Police and Public Safety Christine Dell said Monday that the government was not interested in changing the bill.

Bill 70, sees the Director of Defense appointed by the Government, and the Sergeant is responsible for security and security. The Director shall employ at least 10 officers in uniform and armed.

In the current structure four to five plainclothes security officers and the sergeant in charge of the security of the building and its surroundings are in charge.

“The purpose of Bill 70 is to improve the security of the Assembly building and the surrounding area,” Dell told the committee Monday night.

He asserted that his confession had been obtained through torture, and that his confession had been obtained through torture.

Tell him that the officers will come under his ministry as the highway patrol and reform officers do.

The sergeant resigned in February

Dell and Premier Scott Mo have defended the bill since it was introduced in the fall. Say “the world has changed” and there should be security in the building as well.

Both stressed that the bill was not meant to curb protests.

“I am a strong supporter of safe, legal opposition. People have a right to do so. People have no right to be held accountable for any criminal offense,” Dell said Monday.

The current security team, led by Terry Quinn at the time, was not keen on responding to the threats, but say in December that he did not provide examples.

Quinn resigned in February and was replaced by Sean Darling.

“What we’re talking about is a security unit that is really keen on getting information, but not waiting for something to happen and then setting their hair on fire,” Dell told reporters Monday. “I don’t want to do that, I don’t want to wait until something happens, it’s time to plan.

“I want to say that we have done our best. If anything happens, the government is responsible, not the NDP.”

He referred to the struggle that took place on the steps of the legislature before the throne speech on October 27th.

According to Government House President Jeremy Harrison, a large crowd called for the cancellation of outdoor ceremonies “for the safety of all involved.”

The event on Monday did not trigger the bill, which was introduced within a month.

“It wasn’t a thin one,” Dell said. “We all secretly knew what happened here on Throne Speech Day. It’s a big piece.”

The questions of the opposition need new power

Sarwar says the opposition has no evidence that the sergeant and his crew failed to do their job.

“What can this new security force do that the Sergeant and his crew did not do?” Said the server.

Opposition parties have stated they will not run in the by-elections, but say the process is flawed and has not been discussed at the All-Party Local Government Board.

“We have never opposed or prevented any attempt to improve security in this building,” Sarwar said. “If there is a desire to have more members of a security force in the building here, we would be happy to work at the internal economic desk to make sure there is money for that to happen.”

Opposition to the Govt-19 decree on October 27 prompted the cancellation of the Throne Speech ceremonies outside. (Dane Patterson / CBC)

Sarawar expressed concern that the government was using the bill to control the security of the building and its surroundings.

“It’s a people’s building. It’s always a people’s building. It should always be a people’s building,” Sarwar said.

“I brought my children into this building. If there are security issues they do not share and if they do not share with us – to be clear, it is a serious problem.”

In December, Patrick Shaw, who had served as a sergeant in Saskatchewan for 20 years, said changes were not needed.

“I personally do not see what will be gained by changing that,” Shaw told the CBC’s presenter Stephanie Langer. Morning Edition. “I think it is very important to have an independent body that serves all parties in a non-discriminatory way.”

The government is spending $ 1.9M on a new security team

Tell them Monday that there will be five Social Security officers patrolling the Vascona center.

In April, those officers were transferred from the Provincial Capital Commission to the newly created Provincial Security Services under the umbrella of the Ministry of Corrections, Police and Public Security.

The government has allocated more than $ 1.9 million to the new Security Council:

  • $ 684,000 in salary for 11 members.
  • $ 843,000 operating fund.
  • $ 440,000 for shelters and potential tenant upgrades.

Tell says the new security force will consist of provincial government employees and not a private security company. She did not know when the new team would be operational, but said it would be “late fall” by 2022.

Dell did not elaborate on how the new security team would affect the commissioners working in the building.

The bill was discussed in committee 70

The bill was debated in committee Monday night and went on again until Tuesday afternoon.

On Tuesday, Sarwar asked for the cost of security for the current legislature, which is subject to the Speaker’s jurisdiction.

“Once this law is passed, it will be one of the first priorities we look at,” said Dale Larson, deputy minister for amendments, police and public safety.

Sarwar asked who the government had consulted before introducing the bill. Say no to advice.

Tell pointed to “increased threats”, “higher political rhetoric” and threats against elected and non-elected government officials.

Amendments to Saskatchewan and Police Minister Christine Dell said security in the legislature needed to be restructured because “the world is changing.” (Brian Aeneas / CBC)

Independent MLA Nadine Wilson is wary of the plan.

“We don’t need to turn this building into a castle,” Wilson said. “We don’t need bodyguards, we need unity.”

Larsen said those individuals will be held accountable under the Public Complaints Commission if mistakes are made in hiring.

Tell the staff that they will be “well-trained” and that the security service will be “more comprehensive” than the existing service.

Question time debate centered on Bill 70

On Wednesday, the server was asked to tell Bill about the entire question period.

Sarwar said he had told the Dell committee that the bill was passed last fall at the request of the cabinet.

It is not possible to say who raised this idea or when it was put forward.

Sarwar also said that the government had deliberately “run the clock” in the committee by asking government members to ask questions until the 20-hour debate limit was reached.

Harrison said the server violated house rules by sharing with the media before presenting his proposed amendment.

Following the question period, Sarwar said the amendment was related to a specific clause in the bill and the government could not table it as time was running out.

He said government members could present it further if they wished.

The bill is expected to be put to a vote on Wednesday, the second day of the Assembly.