Khaled Al Nahi
The eldest son is always the arrogant son in the family, and he takes what he wants, whether it is with the consent of the family and parents or without their consent.
As for the younger son, he is the spoiled son, whom the parents give him what he wants without objection, and the whole family is mocked only to his satisfaction, and to obtain his smile.
And between the old and the small, there is that character who is obedient to everyone, carrying out their orders, bearing their fatigue, and taking the blame for any defect that occurs in the house.
And if some achievement happens, or if the head of the family wants to meet and talk with the family, he often says that you are all my children, and I do not differentiate between you in anything, and that I am satisfied with you.
But if something goes wrong in a certain duty assigned to him by the middle son, then the father and the whole family put the blame on the middle son, but if the middle son complains about a job, or complains about what he sees as injustice against him, they told him: Aren’t you ashamed to complain about your parents?
Have you not read the Qur’an (Do not say to them, Ava)
We used to think that the victimhood of the middle son was only in the family, but apparently we were wrong, as it is present in all fields of life, for example politics
Here we find that Ammar al-Hakim was obedient to the authority, and when it gave instructions, he implemented them immediately, as it enjoys patriarchy for him, so he obeyed him when she asked to reduce the three presidencies at a time when the largest bloc disobeyed, implementing its directive
And he obeyed her again when she asked for the nomination of technocratic ministers, so his representative in the Ministry of Oil and Transport resigned, despite the fact that this reason made him lose his audience, and even his leaders in the Supreme Islamic Council, while others quickly said that Mr. Sistani, is not our reference and we are only satisfied with his opinion, not we must obey him,
In spite of all this obedience that does not have a favor from the son over the father, the father comes at every merit, to say I stand at the same distance from everyone, so the people’s punishment falls on the audience of Sayyid al-Hakim, whose audience represents the imitators of Sayyid Sistani’s reference, as for the masses of other Shiite blocs, They do not stand at the same distance, they go to the polls to vote for their candidates without stopping to ask about the candidate, whether he is honest or not. The important thing is that he represents the candidate of their list.
The loser in this is the middle son who is obedient to his reference at all times, even if this leads to his defeat.